Philippines Anti-Cybercrime Police Groupe MOST WANTED PEOPLE List!

 

 

 

#1 Mick Jerold Dela Cruz Present Address: 1989 C. Pavia St. Tondo, Manila If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083	#2 Gremelyn Nemuco Present Address; One Rockwell, Makati City If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083	#3 Vinna Vargas Address: Imus, Cavite  If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083	#4 Ivan Dela Cruz Present Address: Imus, Cavite If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083
#5 Elton Danao Permanent Address: 2026 Leveriza, Fourth Pasay, Manila  Present Address: Naic, Cavite If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083	#6 Virgelito Dada Present Address: Grass Residences, Quezon City  If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083	#7 John Christopher Salazar Permanent address: Rivergreen City Residences, Sta. Ana, Manila If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083	#8 Xanty Octavo  If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083
#9 Daniel Boco Address: Imus, Cavite   If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083	#10 James Gonzalo Tulabot Permanent Address: Blk. 4 Lot 30, Daisy St. Lancaster Residences, Alapaan II-A, Imus, Cavite  Present Address: Pasay City If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083	#11 Lea Jeanee Belleza If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083	#12 Juan Sonny Belleza If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491 Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

 

FXCL SCAM Company Details:

OUTSTRIVE SOLUTIONS PH CALL CENTER SERVICES

The President told the city officials to draft for his study a bill giving Manila a share in the income of the Bureau of Customs. He also assured the city officials that he would submit to the Cabinet their request for a portion of land in Malate belonging to the National Government for market and school sites. In their letters of resignation sent to the President on December 18, the three officials submitted actually two resignations; namely, that from their original positions and that from their being members ex officio of the Monetary Board by virtue of the original positions which they held. The last delegation received by the President was composed of Bulacan school officials who sought assistance on the early implementation of Republic Act No. 842, providing for salary adjustments of secondary school teachers. With the Bulacan delegation were Senator-elect Francisco Rodrigo, Rep. Rogaciano Mercado, Gov. Alejo Santos, Mayor-elect Magno Gatchalian of Paombong, and Roman L. Santos, division superintendent of schools. THE President fired this day Conrado B. Leonardo, an employee of the President’s Complaint and Action Committee, and ordered a speedy investigation and prosecution of three criminal charges of estafa filed against Leonardo. December 13.—FOR the second time this year, the President received Malacañang newsmen at a breakfast conference this morning.

The part need not be a substantial part as a change may qualify as a revision even if it only involves some of the important provisions. For as long as the intention and plan to be carried out contemplate a consideration of all the provisions of the Constitution “to determine which should be altered or suppressed, or whether the whole document should be replaced with an entirely new one,” the proposed change may be deemed a revision and not merely an amendment. One last matter to be considered is whether the petition may be allowed under RA 6735, since only amendments to the Constitution may be the subject of a people’s initiative. Relatedly, the Court held that “ ontests which do not involve the election, returns and qualifications of elected officials are not subjected to the exercise of the judicial or quasi-judicial powers of courts or administrative agencies”. I am not even entirely comfortable with the theoretical underpinnings of Section 10. The Constitution indubitably grants the people the right to seek amendment of the charter through initiative, and mandates Congress to “provide for the implementation of the exercise of this right.” In doing so, Congress may not restrict the right to initiative on grounds that are not provided for in the Constitution.

Another day at the office

For it is only “the people” (comprising the minimum of 12% of the total number of registered voters, of which every legislative district must be represented by at least three per centum of the registered voters therein) who are the proper parties to initiate a petition proposing amendments to the Constitution. Verily, the petition filed with the COMELEC by herein petitioners Lambino and Aumentado is not a people’s initiative. On the factor of changes in law and in facts, certain realities on ground cannot be blinked away. The urgent need to adjust certain provisions of the 1987 Constitution to enable the country to compete in the new millennium is given. The only point of contention is the mode to effect the change—whether through constituent assembly, constitutional convention or people’s initiative. Petitioners claim that they have gathered over six million registered voters who want to amend the Constitution through people’s initiative and that their signatures have been verified by registrars of the COMELEC. 6735 is insufficient to implement the direct right of the people to amend the Constitution through an initiative cannot waylay the will of 6.3 million people who are the bearers of our sovereignty and from whom all government authority emanates. New developments in our internal and external social, economic, and political settings demand the reexamination of the Santiago case. The stare decisis rule is no reason for this Court to allow the people to step into the future with a blindfold. The proposed changes to the Constitution cover other subjects that are beyond the main proposal espoused by the petitioners.

The CONCOM granted this enormous power to our courts in view of our experience under martial law where abusive exercises of state power were shielded from judicial scrutiny by the misuse of the political question doctrine. Led by the eminent former Chief Justice Roberto Concepcion, the CONCOM expanded and sharpened the checking powers of the judiciary vis-à-vis the Executive and the Legislative departments of government. In cases involving the proclamation of martial law and suspension of the privilege of habeas corpus, it is now beyond dubiety that the government can no longer invoke the political question defense. Various groups and individuals sought intervention, filing pleadings supporting or opposing the Lambino Group’s petition.

April 2013 Philippine Supreme Court Decisions on Criminal Law and Procedure

He was sent to Spain by the Sweepstakes board last year to study the Spanish lottery system, which has since been introduced locally with success. The President today approved a resolution of the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes board of directors appointing Eugenio E. Santos as general manager of the PCS, to succeed Fabian R. Millar. The same resolution named Millar as a member of the Sweepstakes board of directors. In the course of their conference, Sen. Zulueta remarked that in the present struggle in Iloilo he was not as interested in the result of the contested governorship as in the maintenance of the clean elections which he said was the policy of the President. Other callers today included Col. Harry A. Brenn, chief of the ICA, Rep. Rodolfo Ganzon of Iloilo; and a delegation from Palauig, Zambales, headed by Mayor Ricardo D. Asis.

However, the Supreme Court, in the landmark case of Santiago vs. Commission on Elections struck down the said law for being incomplete, inadequate, or wanting in essential terms and conditions insofar as initiative on amendments to the Constitution is concerned. The incumbent President and Vice President shall serve until the expiration of their term at noon on the thirtieth day of June 2010 and shall continue to exercise their powers under the 1987 Constitution unless impeached by a vote of two thirds of all the members of the interim parliament. The 6.3 million signatories did not sign the petition of 25 August 2006 or the amended petition of 30 August 2006 filed with the COMELEC. Alberto C. Agra signed the petition and amended petition as counsels for “Raul L. Lambino and Erico B. Aumentado, Petitioners.” In the COMELEC, the Lambino stole my deposit Group, claiming to act “together with” the 6.3 million signatories, merely attached the signature sheets to the petition and amended petition. Thus, the petition and amended petition filed with the COMELEC did not even comply with the basic requirement of RA 6735 that the Lambino Group claims as valid. Nevertheless, even assuming that RA 6735 is valid to implement the constitutional provision on initiatives to amend the Constitution, this will not change the result here because the present petition violates Section 2, Article XVII of the Constitution. To be a valid initiative, the present initiative must first comply with Section 2, Article XVII of the Constitution even before complying with RA 6735. Accordingly, we reject Mabon’s argument that Article XVII, section 2, does not apply to constitutional revisions proposed by initiative.

How green is your office?

When an airplane crashes, the Federal Aviation Administration investigates all angles leading to the crash including aircraft design, metal fatigue, control malfunction, and pilot error. After all, lives were lost and a thorough investigation and proactive measures could prevent future recurrence and save countless other lives. In the case of the van flipping over at NLEX, it’s almost too easy to point to the negligence of driver, operator, or vehicle owner as the cause. Did the driver, operator or owner knowingly operate the van on the highways with balding or worn-out tires? Were there vulcanizing repairs done on the van’s tire that weakened it and led to the blowout? Or did the tire come in contact with an object on the ground that caused the blowout? Until his designation, the new vice-chief of staff was the commanding general of the Philippine Army Training Command and the 3rd Division, PA.

MR. SUAREZ. We would be amenable except that, as we clarified a while ago, this process of initiative is limited to the matter of amendment and should not expand into a revision which contemplates a total overhaul of the Constitution. However, in view of the very heavy agenda of the Committee on Local Government, it took sometime before the committee could act on these. But as they say in Tagalog, huli man daw at magaling ay naihahabol din. The passage of this bill therefore, my dear colleagues, could be one of our finest hours when we can set aside our personal and political consideration for the greater good of our people. I therefore respectfully urge and plead that this bill be immediately approved. Mr. Speaker, I think this Congress, particularly this House, cannot ignore or cannot be insensitive to the call for initiative and referendum. Maybe we should have done it in 1988 but that too had already passed, but it is only February 1989, Mr. Speaker, and we have enough time this year at least to respond to the need of our people to participate directly in the work of legislation.

The guiding original intention of an amendment is to improve specific parts or to add new provisions deemed necessary to meet new conditions or to suppress specific portions that may have become obsolete or that are judged to be dangerous. In revision, however, the guiding original intention and plan contemplate a re-examination of the entire document—or of provisions of the document —to determine how and to what extent it should be altered. Thus, for instance, a switch from the presidential system to a parliamentary system would be a revision because of its overall impact on the entire constitutional structure. So would a switch from a bicameral system to a unicameral system because of its effect on other important provisions of the Constitution. Like the Delfin petition in Santiago, the PIRMA petition proposed to submit to the people in a plebiscite the amendment to the Constitution on the lifting of the term limits of elected officials. While purportedly only Articles VI, VII, and XVIII are involved, the fact is, as the petition and text of the proposed changes themselves state, every provision of the Constitution will have to be examined to see if they conform to the nature of a unicameral-parliamentary form of government and changed accordingly if they do not so conform to it. For example, Article VIII on Judicial Department cannot stand as is, in a parliamentary system, for under such a system, the Parliament is supreme, and thus the Court’s power to declare its act a grave abuse of discretion and thus void would be an anomaly. Even a cursory reading of the proposed changes contained in the petition for initiative herein involved will show on its face that the proposed changes constitute a revision of the Constitution. The proposal is to change the system of government from that which is bicameral-presidential to one that is unicameral-parliamentary.

Notably, the said Presidential Decree No. 832 did not contain any provision for judicial review of the resolutions, orders or decisions of the PACLAP. The property being fought over by the parties is a 10.36-hectare property in Baguio City called Dominican Hills, formerly registered in the name of Diplomat Hills, Inc. It appeared that the property was mortgaged to the United Coconut Planters Bank which eventually foreclosed the mortgage thereon and acquired the same as highest bidder. On April 11, 1983, it was donated to the Republic of the Philippines by UCPB through its President, Eduardo Cojuangco. The deed of donation stipulated that Dominican Hills would be utilized for the “priority programs, projects, activities in human settlements and economic development and governmental purposes” of the Ministry of Human Settlements. More broadly, the Justice Department revealed in court documents Monday night about the search for former Trump attorney John Eastman, who spearheaded a plot to overturn the 2020 election. The Integrated Bar of the Philippines on Thursday said it will join calls to have the Supreme Court dismiss the quo warranto petition filed against Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno. These constitutional guarantees are not for the benefit of the press so much as for the benefit of all the people,65 by giving the citizens unrestricted access to information and views66 on all sides of an issue.

Having been raised in the Philippines a Protesant, I know that the predominantly Catholic people can say some baseless things about people of other religions. I know it’s even worse for those who believe in Islam than for non-Catholic Christians. But I don’t think that the warnings they gave you about going to Basilan were “racist” against Muslims. That’s because I think they were trying to warn you about Abu Sayyaf, not about Muslims. Perhaps they should have been more specific when warning you, but it may also have been their reluctance to delve into details. And tourists do need to be informed — it may be riskier for them to actually go to tourist areas than to go to Basilan and learn about the rich Islamic heritage of the Philippines. I think you had a great experience — I would hope that you would see the warnings you got from non-Muslims in the north as a genuine attempt to look out for your well-being and a warning about Abu Sayyaf and not as racist comments against Muslims. As a filipino growing up in suburban manila, even we’ve been brainwashed by the media to avoid stepping foot in southern mindanao, what more someone who looks completely foreign?

The insurer’s officials also mentioned the problem during a routine telephone discussion of pending safety issues with regulators a year ago, said Stephen Witmer, State Farm spokesmanxxvi. Internal documents produced during the congressional investigation in August-September 2000 from Bridgestone/Firestone show that officials of the company were briefed as early as February 2000 about rising warranty costs for the tires that the company retailed the previous month. The Congressional investigators’ documents also included charts prepared for the sales staff’s annual meeting in February 2000 that repeatedly and prominently mention the high cost of warranty claims for tread separation in light truck tires. Other charts analyzed patterns in tread separations and emphasized tires for light trucks, a category that includes the Ford E xplorer.

laws shield business from corporate tax

It is now contended that this traditional distinction between amendment and revision was abrogated by the 1987 Constitution. It is urged that Section 1 of Article XVII gives the power to amend or revise to Congress acting as a constituent assembly, and to a Constitutional Convention duly called by Congress for the purpose. Section 2 of the same Article, it is said, limited the people’s right to change the Constitution via initiative through simple amendments. In other words, the people cannot propose substantial amendments amounting to revision. Oppositors-intervenors contend that Sections 1 and 2, Article XVII of the 1987 Constitution, only allow the use of people’s initiative to amend and not to revise the Constitution. They theorize that the changes proposed by petitioners are substantial and thus constitute a revision which cannot be done through people’s initiative. The proposed constitutional changes, albeit substantial, are mere amendments and can be undertaken through people’s initiative. Whether the exercise of an initiative to propose amendments to the Constitution is a political question to be determined solely by the sovereign people.

• Going down to the Palace front door to board his car, he was intercepted by a large delegation of farmers from Nueva Ecija, Tarlac, and Pangasinan who presented him with a resolution wishing him a “Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year” and thanking him for all the things he had done to alleviate the plight of the tenants.
• This is a solemn and important duty imposed on the election registrar which he cannot delegate to any other person, even to barangay officials.
• He added that such expenditures should be charged against the corporation and not against the tenants.
• The Lambino Group trivializes the serious matter of changing the fundamental law of the land.
• Whether the Court should re-examine the ruling in Santiago v. COMELEC that there is no sufficient law implementing or authorizing the exercise of people’s initiative to amend the Constitution.

The association of women lawyers was headed by Judge Natividad Almeda-Lopez and Mrs. Minerva Inocencio-Piguing, honorary president and president, respectively. The women lawyers also thanked the President for his encouragement of the participation of then colleagues in the government, particularly in the judiciary. Negado assured the President that the MWD employees would be retained in office. He explained that the board resolution did not intend to by off any employee. As a matter of fact, he said, no employee had been fired except one who had been removed from office for cause. The President gave his directive in the course of an unannounced visit to the NWSA office this morning. He told Negado that he had received reports that the NWSA board had passed a resolution to the effect that MWD employees were to be laid off December 1, unless reappointed. The Chief Executive said that the MWD personnel should be allowed to continue working under the new set-up. Encarnacion, who acted as spokesman, said that the delay often caused the deterioration of cargos of fish and sometimes resulted in the loss of a whole night’s catch.